All Casino News in English
Spielerschutz

Personalized intervention calls significantly reduce gambling losses

30 July 20266 Min.by Lisa Lustich
Editorially reviewed by Lisa LustichLast review:
Personalisierte Anrufe senken Verluste bei Risiko-Spielern deutlich

A study at Norsk Tipping shows that 57.3 percent of contacted at-risk players engaged in counseling calls, leading to measurable reductions in bets and gambling days.

Player protection in the online gambling industry is often a dry topic, buried in long texts about responsibility and fine print. However, Norway is taking a step further by seeking direct conversation. A new scientific study now proves that personal contact via telephone is one of the most effective weapons against problematic gambling behavior. The state-owned operator Norsk Tipping has been using this method since 2015 to reach customers before they slip into addiction. The data is clear: those who receive a call often play more sensibly afterward.

The timing of these interventions is particularly interesting. The study makes it clear that calls are most effective when early warning signs appear. It is not about offering a simple solution to those who are already severely addicted, but about intercepting young players or new customers at the first signs of escalation. The goal is to reduce the risk of loss through education and individual counseling directly on the phone.

Numbers and facts

The study is based on a broad database of 4,752 customers who were contacted by the player protection team between 2022 and 2024. The researchers analyzed the behavior of this group 12 weeks before and after the contact attempt. Reachability was surprisingly high: 68.2 percent of the selected players answered at least one call. 57.3 percent even conducted a full counseling conversation. The impact on the gambling accounts was measurable immediately.

The study recorded consistent declines in almost all relevant categories. These include the number of gambling days, total wagers, net losses, theoretical losses, and the number of deposits. Particularly impressive is the willingness for self-regulation during the call: 43.7 percent of the participants set lower loss limits for their account during the conversation. Additionally, 12.6 percent opted for a complete self-exclusion and 0.7 percent chose a temporary break.

"Proactive outreach appears to be an effective tool in reducing harmful gambling behaviour, particularly when applied early and tailored to risk signals." - Summary of the researchers, Norsk Tipping Study

Background

The system behind these calls is based on sophisticated algorithms. Norsk Tipping uses the tool Spillepuls, which specifically identifies young players with high losses or customers whose gambling behavior suddenly intensifies. The monitoring tool Playscan is also used to identify long-term risk patterns. The staff in the headquarters use motivational interviewing techniques and make up to three call attempts per customer.

Comparing this to other Nordic countries shows a mixed picture. While Denmark achieves a channelization rate of 90 percent through clever data usage by the authority Spillemyndigheden, countries like Finland are still struggling with aggressive offshore operators. The Finnish police recently investigated a Maltese operator that specifically targeted minors via SMS. Such examples illustrate how important a regulated market is, where player protection takes priority over profit.

Why it matters for German players

For German players, the situation is similarly strictly regulated by the State Treaty on Gambling 2021 (GlüStV 2021), although technically solved differently. In Germany, there is the cross-provider LUGAS system, which enforces a monthly deposit limit of 1,000 euros as well as strict stake limits of 1 euro per spin on virtual slot machines. While the personal call is the focus in Norway, Germany relies primarily on rigid limits and technical blocks.

Players at GGL-licensed providers enjoy the highest level of protection. However, the data from Norway shows that technical blocks alone are often not enough. Awareness of one's own behavior is sharpened more effectively by a conversation than by an automatic error message in the browser. Anyone playing in Germany should therefore use the whitelist of the Gemeinsame Glücksspielbehörde der Länder (GGL) to ensure they do not end up at illegal MGA or Curacao casinos, which often ignore such proactive player protection measures entirely.

What it means for GGL-licensed casinos

German casinos with a GGL license could use the Norwegian results as a guide to refine their social concepts. Although German operators are already obliged to report suspicious gambling behavior and contact players, the Norwegian study proves that the quality of the contact is decisive. A standardized mailing has less effect than a real telephone call with trained personnel.

The integration of early detection systems like Spillepuls could also help to increase the acceptance of limits in this country. If players understand why a limit makes sense, the risk of them migrating to black market providers decreases. The Danish experience also shows that pragmatic, data-based regulation is more stable in the long term than purely politically motivated restrictions. German operators must therefore master the balancing act between strict legal requirements and customer-oriented prevention.

Additional sources: [igamingbusiness.com, igamingbusiness.com]

Frequently asked questions

How do the prevention calls at Norsk Tipping work?

Employees use tools like Spillepuls and Playscan to identify players with high risk or significant losses. Up to three attempts are made to reach the customer by phone to conduct a motivational talk about their gambling behavior.

What impact do these phone calls have on gambling behavior?

The study demonstrates significant reductions in net losses, gambling days, and deposits. The measure is particularly effective for young players and new customers, with over 43 percent of participants lowering their loss limits after the call.

Why is the Danish model a role model for regulators?

In Denmark, the authority Spillemyndigheden uses transaction data from all licensees to monitor the market precisely. This led to a very high channelization rate of 90 percent, as regulatory measures are based on real facts instead of assumptions.

Are such measures also mandatory for online casinos in Germany?

Yes, German providers with a GGL license must implement a social concept according to the State Treaty on Gambling 2021 and intervene in cases of gambling addiction risk. Implementation in Germany also occurs via technical systems like LUGAS (limit monitoring) and OASIS (exclusion system).

About the author

Lisa Lustich

Lisa Lustich

Editor-in-chief & casino tester

Lisa Lustich has been testing German-language online casinos since 1997 and runs the Lustich.de newsroom. More than 400 published reviews, certified player-protection advisor (BZgA training, 2019).

All articles by Lisa Lustich

Sources & further reading

In category:Player Protection News
In country:Norway
Companies mentioned:Norsk Tipping

Gambling can be addictive. Please play responsibly. Help and counselling at 0800 1 372 700 (BZgA, free & anonymous).

Related topics

Further Reading